Johns Hopkins students develop campaign to combat coronavirus-related racism
Incidents of hate crimes, assaults, and harassment are increasing, especially against Asian-Americans and Asian immigrants in the United States, according to the Anti-Defamation League, which fights antisemitism and discrimination. This uptick, the ADL reports, is linked to misinformation and fear surrounding the spread of COVID-19, which was first detected in China.
A team of Johns Hopkins undergraduates is confronting that rising trend of discrimination through a marketing campaign they developed to combat racism on campus and beyond. Their project, “Connect to Protect,” was developed as part of the Advertising/Integrated Marketing Communications class, offered through the Whiting School of Engineering’s Center for Leadership Education. The marketing campaign is designed for the McCain Institute’s Peer2Peer: Protective Project, a national marketing initiative that empowers university students to combat targeted violence and hate through the development and deployment of dynamic, integrated campaigns.
The student campaign features social media challenges, online trivia games, and informative and reflective blog posts on a student-designed website. The team also created a “Labels” initiative, which includes both video and social media elements. In the video, class members and their friends create labels that reflect discriminatory words they’ve been called. One Asian student holds up a label reading “corona.”
Vance Wood, a computer science major who worked on the campaign, is optimistic about its potential to make an impact.
“Racial biases in people are passed on,” Wood says. “I hope that by educating people on the issue and getting a message of camaraderie out, we can stop these biases from being passed down.”
As they developed the campaign, students were encouraged to share their own stories on social platforms or privately in interviews. As students engaged with the campaign, their awareness of prejudice at Hopkins grew. When asked how much the campaign increased their understanding of racism on campus on a one to 10 scale, with one being “not at all” and 10 being “very much,” those who engaged with the campaign’s website, Facebook, and trivia platforms rated themselves 8.33 out of 10 on average. And students rated their understanding of targeted violence as nine out of 10 after engaging with the campaign’s website and Instagram accounts.
Leslie Kendrick, the course instructor, says that inclusivity was always the campaign’s central message, but that the recent increase in xenophobia related to COVID-19 compelled the students to seek innovative ways to tailor the message further.
“Pre-campaign research had also elicited personal experiences with Asians being verbally attacked and told to ‘go back to China’,” says Kendrick.